How ethical are Minnesota's big businesses?

Covalence just released a study ranking 581 Dow Jones companies based on ethical issues like "labour standards, waste management, product social utility or human rights policy."

At least 11 companies based in Minnesota made the cut. Only Best Buy and General Mills broke 50 (barely). Most, like Target and US Bancorp, fell somewhere in the middle (this is probably the place to emphasize that all these rankings are relative, there are no saints on this list).

Failing dismally, in the bottom 10%, is Mosaic Co. They're a Monsanto-like chemical manufacturer. From their website, it looks like they specialize in crop additives, feed additives (yuck), and "specialized products." They were created in 2004 from a merger of IMC Global and Crop Nutrition division of Cargill.

Part of their business involves mining, including phosphates, using what a Florida resident calls "strip-mining." The company ran into a little opposition from environmentalists and townships in Florida, in retribution they used their legal muscle to challenge the townships' right to build water reservoirs, according to this editorial BY the Englewood Herald-Tribune. They were also actually fined by the state of Florida in 2004 for a spill at a phosphate processing plant that spilled millions of acidic wastewater into nearby creek. Not surprisingly, they've been active in the fight against wetland preservation.

45. Best Buy Co. Inc. | Retail

50. General Mills Inc. | Food & Beverages

136. Ecolab Inc. | Chemicals

198. 3M Co. | Industrial Goods & Services

257. Target Corp. | Retail

265. Unitedhealth Group Inc. | Health Care

276. US Bancorp | Banks

345. Ameriprise Financial Inc. | Financial Services

369. The Travelers Companies Inc. | Insurance

374. Medtronic Inc. | Health Care

500. Mosaic Co. | Chemicals

Review: Molly Ivins: A Rebel Life

Molly Ivins: A Rebel Life

By Bill Minutaglio and W. Michael Smith

For those not familiar with her, Molly Ivins was a Texan daughter of privilege who rose through the ranks of newspaper and political journalism (including the Minneapolis Tribune) before becoming a successful nationally syndicated columnist. She died of cancer in 2007.

This is typical of her statements:

"The thing about democracy, beloveds, is that it is not neat, orderly, or quiet. It requires a certain relish for confusion."

Molly Ivins is a personal hero of mine. Despite not always agreeing with her exact politics, her passion and sense of justice were undeniable. Her columns in the fallout after 9/11, when Bush somehow had 90 percent approval ratings, were a small light in the dark of unending war and cynical manipulations of fear. I'd bet that her final column, dictated to an assistant as she was racked by cancer, will bring tears to your eyes.

This recently released biography is an exhaustive chronological examination of Ivins, using letters, friends, and published writings. It guides us from her grandparents, through her revolt against her privileged upbringing as the daughter of a Texas oil man (sound familiar?), to her

position as one of the most popular columnists in the country. It really is a well-researched book that keeps Ivins' memory alive. I'd recommend it to anyone curious about her upbringing or path through journalism.

Despite the attention to detail and thrown-in curse words, what the book fails to do is capture the spirit of Molly Ivins.

It's interesting to see her high school elitism as she dabbles with Ayn Rand and a patrician

boyfriend, but it's only consequential as far as it builds the woman she becomes. The writers

spend much time analyzing Ivin's relationship with her father, attributing her activism to him and his bourgeois Texan values. And they sketch lines between Ivins and G.W. Bush, one of h

er main subjects in later life.

Essentially, it argues that the epic Texan Molly Ivins was a conscious creation (a difficult argument to prove considering we all play a hand in forging our identities). With all the time spent exploring her background, the book should instead be called "A Rebel Aristocrat."

But I'm reminded of stories that journalism elders passed down from Ivin's days at the

Minneapolis Tribune. I've been told she was a police reporter who dug in the muck enough for

the MPD to name their annual pig at their pig roast after her. I was told of her glee at the honor. The book tells instead of her testifying in court against police for her then-activist boyfriend. It strikes me that much of her myth was created by people who knew her through

stories like these-- yes, with some contexts smudged-- but these myths were themselves a testament to her character.

What I miss about this book is Molly's passion, her optimism, and her distrust of authority. While this book documents the details of her life and attempts to psychologically analyze her, a focus on the values to which she dedicated her existence would better have fit the title, "A Rebel Life."